Posted by
John Jakubczyk on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 7:50:28 PM
There must be something about
February that brings out the weird, the unusual and the strange in
politics.
Wait a minute – those words
all mean the same thing. Ah, but it sounded poetic. You all remember your
English teacher reminding you to set up your speech with triads. After all,
half the battle in giving a speech is to make sure that it resonates with the
audience. For those who have purchased a vacuum cleaner at your front door or
the today’s version of the Yugo, you know what I mean.
He was nice and it all sounded so good!
Well, that my friends is my
reaction when I read Doug Kmeic’s
article in Slate, claiming that Barack Hussain Obama is a “natural for the
Catholic vote.” Now I know and respect Doug as a brilliant legal mind and a
good man. But, I must take issue with him on his ability to take such talents
and apply them to the current situation in this crazy and often mixed up world
of politics. I will defer any comments
on his selection during the primary. Mr. Romney was gracious in realizing that
he could not win and as I am preparing this article, he is releasing his
delegates to Senator McCain and announcing his support for the Arizona Senator.
Doug’s first error is in
comparing the substance and style of Ronald Reagan with Obama. Certainly anyone
who can give a good speech can be hailed has a great communicator. But the
reason that Reagan attracted so many Catholics and Democrats was because they
knew him. They knew him as the actor who played George Gip in “Knute
Rockne.” They knew him from the days
when he introduced the stories on Death Valley Days. They knew him as the
governor in California
who stood up to the student sit-ins, and did all of this with a smile. They
remembered the days when he traveled the country giving speeches on economic
freedom and against communism. So when he ran for president and repeated
principles based upon respect for the sanctity of life, economic and personal
freedom, and national security, the much of the Catholic population responded
positively. When he spoke of a shining city on the hill, and that America’s best
days were ahead, he reminded many Catholics of the hope that comes from God.
Reagan never tired of reminding people that our rights are a gift from the
Creator, especially the right to life.
Ronald Reagan spoke a language
that Catholics and those who believed in God could understand.
Now let us look as Senator Obama.
He is an attractive articulate voice for secular liberalism, wrapped up in a
mantle that eschews labels and speaks about hope, and unity and the
future. He creates energy, much like a
movie star or celebrity. How much of it is a reaction to Hillary is a
legitimate question. After all a year ago, all of the pundits were telling the
great unwashed (and those of us who do bathe) that the general election was
going to be between Hillary and Rudy. We pro-lifers were told to get use to it.
When we objected, we were ridiculed.
Such are the vagaries of life.
Obama to his credit has run a positive campaign (notwithstanding his
positions on issues which are not very positive at all). People like positive
messages. They may not have much substance but the people like them. Hillary
represents the scandals of the previous Clinton
era. A lot of people are simply tired of
the Clintons. Obama
gives them an excuse to vote for “change” and break with the tired policies of
the Clintons.
But that does
not translate into Catholic support for Obama.
When Catholics learn how
violently pro-abortion Obama is, they will ask how he can argue for hope and
the future when he supports killing the least of our brethren.
The teaching of the Catholic Church
is clear. You cannot vote for a person who thinks that killing children is
permissible when there is a reasonable alternative.
And most Catholics will not be
turned off by McCain’s support for the death penalty. It is not a
non-negotiable like abortion. Catholic teaching permits the use of the death
penalty in certain situations. This argument is a liberal canard used to excuse
voting for someone who is pro-abortion.
Educated and practicing Catholics are not going to vote for a person who
supports partial birth
abortion and voted against a bill similar to the Born-Alive
Infants Protection Act while in the Illinois Senate.
Barack Obama is a co-sponsor of
the Freedom of Choice Act, a proposed federal law to
nullify virtually all federal and state limitations on abortion. As this
information is brought to the public’s attention, the luster will soon dim from
the media’s latest darling.
As for
Catholics “giving up McCain for Lent,” the truth is that many who were not
originally keen on McCain are and have been giving him a second look. Some
pro-life advocates are still concerned about his lack of understanding on the
stem cell issue, but the latest scientific discoveries may render that
discussion moot. He is and has been for the 24 years of his political life, pro-life. There are some who are concerned about the Iraq question.
His knowledge and understanding of national security will serve him well. But
where McCain will score well is on his love of his country and the story of his
life. If he can translate that story into one of one that promotes the best
interests of the United States in a very dangerous world, if he can remind
people that it is in freedom that we as a people can accomplish the greatest
good, and if he can defend the rights of all persons, born and unborn, to live
in dignity and opportunity by scaling back the destructive growth of
government, then Catholics and others will be drawn to his message.
I do not
see anyone who knew and appreciated Ronald Reagan joining the band wagon of a
pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, anti-family radical like Obama once they know his
positions and can envision what he intends to do to this country. Indeed the
clash of ideas and the clear differences in position once again may be the best
avenue for our country to take as we move toward the election in November. To that end more Catholics will find it
“natural” to vote for the candidate that chooses life and will protect the
lives of all Americans.
John
Jakubczyk is a lawyer and past President of Arizona
Right to Life. He has been involved in the pro- life movement for the last
32 years.